Teachers can build assessments from available question content, draft new questions with AI assistance, review question quality, set timing and access rules, share assessments, and preview the learner experience before publishing.

Objective responses can be graded automatically where the answer key is available. AI-assisted marking can help review theory answers and feedback, but teachers and authorized reviewers should check important academic decisions before relying on them.

Students can take assigned assessments, submit answers, receive available scores and feedback, and use supported learning tools where their plan or organization allows it.

Teachers and organization users can review assessment activity, scores, participation, question-level results, and organization or class trends where the relevant analytics features are enabled.

No. AI outputs are assistive and may be incomplete or inaccurate. Teachers, schools, and authorized users remain responsible for reviewing generated questions, feedback, marking suggestions, and final academic decisions.